The differences are getting harder to ignore.
It is becoming more obvious that there is a BIG difference between the goals and strategies of the mainstream Pro-Life movement and those of us who call ourselves abolitionists.
And the media is starting to notice the difference. Check out my interview with WORLD News below 
What’s the difference anyway?
Roe is gone but Pro-Life leaders continue to advocate for regulating abortion like healthcare instead of treating it like murder.
We are still hearing calls for 15-week bans and regulations for abortion pill manufacturers or providers. They even want to regulate how to dispose of the bodies of babies killed in at-home medication abortions to ensure they are treated like medical waste. [1] 
And nearly every bill they propose still gives mothers complete immunity for killing their own babies, even when they do it knowingly, willingly, and deliberately.
Meanwhile, almost none are calling for Constitutional equal protection of the laws for preborn babies.
Roe is demolished. What is everyone waiting for now?
The silence from Pro-Life leaders on equal protection is DEAFENING.
Abolitionists, on the other hand, are filing bills of equal protection in more states all the time.
Abolition bills aren’t hard to understand and they don’t create complicated new laws. They simply remove abortion exceptions from existing homicide laws that already protect the lives of born people so that the lives of preborn babies are protected by the same laws. It’s very simple.
But equal protection of the laws means that everyone must be equally subject to the law. There is no blanket immunity for anyone (man or woman, doctor or patient) to break the law.
This shouldn’t be a problem for anyone who believes that a fetus is a person. It shouldn’t be at all controversial to say that the lives of preborn people are equally valuable to the lives of born people and should be protected in the same way.
It should be illegal for mothers to murder their children.
Why is that controversial?
But it is, even among organizations and leaders who call themselves Pro-Life.
WORLD News Interview
All of this is making it easy for the media to see the difference between Pro-Life legislation and abolition bills.
Just recently I was able to give an interview to WORLD News about the issue of equal protection of the laws.
We have had many opportunities recently to be a voice for equal protection as news organizations like the New York Times, CNN, and NPR contact the Foundation to Abolish Abortion (FAA) for interviews.
It is a privilege to be able to speak up for babies in this way. We pray that God uses this to amplify the message of equal protection to many people who have never heard it before. 
For life, for justice, and for the glory of God,
Bradley Pierce
President
Abolish Abortion Texas
Foundation to Abolish Abortion
- -
P.S. We want to be a STRONG voice for equal protection WHEN and WHERE it counts. YOU can help us amplify the message of equal protection to the media and beyond by supporting our work TODAY with your one-time or monthly donation.
1. https://www.studentsforlifeaction.org/sflaction-inspired-bill-in-west-virginia-addresses-standards-surrounding-medical-waste-the-environment-with-the-use-of-chemical-abortion/